We found 121 results that contain "tes"
Posted on: #iteachmsu
PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN
Article created by Group Admin
Contrary to popular belief, Lorem Ipsum is not simply random text. It has roots in a piece of classical Latin literature from 45 BC, making it over 2000 years old. Richard McClintock, a Latin professor at Hampden-Sydney College in Virginia, looked up one of the more obscure Latin words, consectetur, from a Lorem Ipsum passage, and going through the cites of the word in classical literature, discovered the undoubtable source. Lorem Ipsum comes from sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 of "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum" (The Extremes of Good and Evil) by Cicero, written in 45 BC. This book is a treatise on the theory of ethics, very popular during the Renaissance. The first line of Lorem Ipsum, "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet..", comes from a line in section 1.10.32.
The standard chunk of Lorem Ipsum used since the 1500s is reproduced below for those interested. Sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 from "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum" by Cicero are also reproduced in their exact original form, accompanied by English versions from the 1914 translation by H. Rackham.
The standard chunk of Lorem Ipsum used since the 1500s is reproduced below for those interested. Sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 from "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum" by Cicero are also reproduced in their exact original form, accompanied by English versions from the 1914 translation by H. Rackham.
Posted by:
E1 GA
Posted on: #iteachmsu
Article created by Group Admin
Contrary to popular belief, Lorem Ipsum is not simply random text. ...
Posted by:
PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN
Thursday, May 9, 2019
Posted on: #iteachmsu
PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN
TAM Model
Technology acceptance model
Based on the theory of reasoned Action, Davis ( 1986 ) developed the Technology Acceptance Model which deals more specifically with the prediction of the acceptability of an information system. The purpose of this model is to predict the acceptability of a tool and to identify the modifications which must be brought to the system in order to make it acceptable to users. This model suggests that the acceptability of an information system is determined by two main factors: perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use.
Perceived usefulness is defined as being the degree to which a person believes that the use of a system will improve his performance. Perceived ease of use refers to the degree to which a person believes that the use of a system will be effortless. Several factorial analyses demonstrated that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use can be considered as two different dimensions (Hauser et Shugan, 1980 ; Larcker et Lessig, 1980 ; Swanson, 1987).
As demonstrated in the theory of reasoned Action, the Technology Acceptance Model postulates that the use of an information system is determined by the behavioral intention, but on the other hand, that the behavioral intention is determined by the person’s attitude towards the use of the system and also by his perception of its utility. According to Davis, the attitude of an individual is not the only factor that determines his use of a system, but is also based on the impact which it may have on his performance. Therefore, even if an employee does not welcome an information system, the probability that he will use it is high if he perceives that the system will improve his performance at work. Besides, the Technology Acceptance Model hypothesizes a direct link between perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. With two systems offering the same features, a user will find more useful the one that he finds easier to use (Dillon and Morris, on 1996).
Based on the theory of reasoned Action, Davis ( 1986 ) developed the Technology Acceptance Model which deals more specifically with the prediction of the acceptability of an information system. The purpose of this model is to predict the acceptability of a tool and to identify the modifications which must be brought to the system in order to make it acceptable to users. This model suggests that the acceptability of an information system is determined by two main factors: perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use.
Perceived usefulness is defined as being the degree to which a person believes that the use of a system will improve his performance. Perceived ease of use refers to the degree to which a person believes that the use of a system will be effortless. Several factorial analyses demonstrated that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use can be considered as two different dimensions (Hauser et Shugan, 1980 ; Larcker et Lessig, 1980 ; Swanson, 1987).
As demonstrated in the theory of reasoned Action, the Technology Acceptance Model postulates that the use of an information system is determined by the behavioral intention, but on the other hand, that the behavioral intention is determined by the person’s attitude towards the use of the system and also by his perception of its utility. According to Davis, the attitude of an individual is not the only factor that determines his use of a system, but is also based on the impact which it may have on his performance. Therefore, even if an employee does not welcome an information system, the probability that he will use it is high if he perceives that the system will improve his performance at work. Besides, the Technology Acceptance Model hypothesizes a direct link between perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. With two systems offering the same features, a user will find more useful the one that he finds easier to use (Dillon and Morris, on 1996).
Authored by:
chathuri

Posted on: #iteachmsu

TAM Model
Technology acceptance model
Based on the theo...
Based on the theo...
Authored by:
PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN
Tuesday, Aug 20, 2019
Posted on: #iteachmsu
PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN
TAM Model 2
Technology acceptance model
Based on the theory of reasoned Action, Davis ( 1986 ) developed the Technology Acceptance Model which deals more specifically with the prediction of the acceptability of an information system. The purpose of this model is to predict the acceptability of a tool and to identify the modifications which must be brought to the system in order to make it acceptable to users. This model suggests that the acceptability of an information system is determined by two main factors: perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use.
Perceived usefulness is defined as being the degree to which a person believes that the use of a system will improve his performance. Perceived ease of use refers to the degree to which a person believes that the use of a system will be effortless. Several factorial analyses demonstrated that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use can be considered as two different dimensions (Hauser et Shugan, 1980 ; Larcker et Lessig, 1980 ; Swanson, 1987).
As demonstrated in the theory of reasoned Action, the Technology Acceptance Model postulates that the use of an information system is determined by the behavioral intention, but on the other hand, that the behavioral intention is determined by the person’s attitude towards the use of the system and also by his perception of its utility. According to Davis, the attitude of an individual is not the only factor that determines his use of a system, but is also based on the impact which it may have on his performance. Therefore, even if an employee does not welcome an information system, the probability that he will use it is high if he perceives that the system will improve his performance at work. Besides, the Technology Acceptance Model hypothesizes a direct link between perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. With two systems offering the same features, a user will find more useful the one that he finds easier to use (Dillon and Morris, on 1996).
Based on the theory of reasoned Action, Davis ( 1986 ) developed the Technology Acceptance Model which deals more specifically with the prediction of the acceptability of an information system. The purpose of this model is to predict the acceptability of a tool and to identify the modifications which must be brought to the system in order to make it acceptable to users. This model suggests that the acceptability of an information system is determined by two main factors: perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use.
Perceived usefulness is defined as being the degree to which a person believes that the use of a system will improve his performance. Perceived ease of use refers to the degree to which a person believes that the use of a system will be effortless. Several factorial analyses demonstrated that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use can be considered as two different dimensions (Hauser et Shugan, 1980 ; Larcker et Lessig, 1980 ; Swanson, 1987).
As demonstrated in the theory of reasoned Action, the Technology Acceptance Model postulates that the use of an information system is determined by the behavioral intention, but on the other hand, that the behavioral intention is determined by the person’s attitude towards the use of the system and also by his perception of its utility. According to Davis, the attitude of an individual is not the only factor that determines his use of a system, but is also based on the impact which it may have on his performance. Therefore, even if an employee does not welcome an information system, the probability that he will use it is high if he perceives that the system will improve his performance at work. Besides, the Technology Acceptance Model hypothesizes a direct link between perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. With two systems offering the same features, a user will find more useful the one that he finds easier to use (Dillon and Morris, on 1996).
Authored by:
chathuri

Posted on: #iteachmsu

TAM Model 2
Technology acceptance model
Based on the theo...
Based on the theo...
Authored by:
PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN
Tuesday, Aug 20, 2019
Posted on: #iteachmsu
PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN
WHAT IS TECHNOLOGY – MEANING OF TECHNOLOGY AND ITS USE
WHAT IS TECHNOLOGY – MEANING OF TECHNOLOGY AND ITS USE
WHAT IS TECHNOLOGY – MEANING OF TECHNOLOGY AND ITS USE
testing
vedio
WHAT IS TECHNOLOGY – MEANING OF TECHNOLOGY AND ITS USE
testing
vedio
Authored by:
chathuri
Posted on: #iteachmsu
WHAT IS TECHNOLOGY – MEANING OF TECHNOLOGY AND ITS USE
WHAT IS TECHNOLOGY – MEANING OF TECHNOLOGY AND ITS USE
WHAT...
WHAT...
Authored by:
PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN
Friday, Sep 13, 2019
Posted on: #iteachmsu
Python Remove a Trailing New Line.
1. Quick Examples of Removing Trailing New Line
These examples will give a high-level overview of methods for removing trailing new lines. We will go through each method in more detail along with examples.
2. rstrip() Remove Trailing New Line in Python
One of the simplest and most commonly used methods in Python to remove trailing new lines is to use the rstrip() method. This method removes any whitespace characters from the end of a string, which includes new lines. To remove a trailing newline from a string, simply call the rstrip() method on that string.
3. String Slicing – Remove Trailing New Lines Characters
Another simple way to remove trailing new lines in Python is to use string slicing. String slicing allows you to extract a portion of a string by specifying a range of indices. By specifying the start and end indices of the string, you can easily remove the trailing newline character.
4. strip() – Strip New Line Character
The strip() method is a more general-purpose method for removing characters from the beginning and end of a string. It can be used to remove not only trailing new lines, but also any other specified characters.
5. splitlines() – Split Newline and Join
Though the splitlines() method is used for splitting a string into a list of lines. It can also be used to remove trailing new lines by splitting a string into lines and then rejoining them without the newline character.
So basically we will first split the string by new lines and then we will use the join() method to join the string. So this new string will contain no new lines character.
These examples will give a high-level overview of methods for removing trailing new lines. We will go through each method in more detail along with examples.
2. rstrip() Remove Trailing New Line in Python
One of the simplest and most commonly used methods in Python to remove trailing new lines is to use the rstrip() method. This method removes any whitespace characters from the end of a string, which includes new lines. To remove a trailing newline from a string, simply call the rstrip() method on that string.
3. String Slicing – Remove Trailing New Lines Characters
Another simple way to remove trailing new lines in Python is to use string slicing. String slicing allows you to extract a portion of a string by specifying a range of indices. By specifying the start and end indices of the string, you can easily remove the trailing newline character.
4. strip() – Strip New Line Character
The strip() method is a more general-purpose method for removing characters from the beginning and end of a string. It can be used to remove not only trailing new lines, but also any other specified characters.
5. splitlines() – Split Newline and Join
Though the splitlines() method is used for splitting a string into a list of lines. It can also be used to remove trailing new lines by splitting a string into lines and then rejoining them without the newline character.
So basically we will first split the string by new lines and then we will use the join() method to join the string. So this new string will contain no new lines character.
Authored by:
Vijaya
Posted on: #iteachmsu
Python Remove a Trailing New Line.
1. Quick Examples of Removing Trailing New Line
T...
T...
Authored by:
Tuesday, Sep 26, 2023
Posted on: #iteachmsu
DISCIPLINARY CONTENT
Master Schedule
Make a master schedule your child can use to block off time to work on his or her assignments. This will help your child prioritize projects and provide a structure to help keep him or her on track to meet due dates. Use a different color for each subject so your child can follow the schedule quickly and easily.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCzf0_oFO6g&ab_channel=LearnGoogleSpreadsheets
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCzf0_oFO6g&ab_channel=LearnGoogleSpreadsheets
Authored by:
Divya Sawant

Posted on: #iteachmsu

Master Schedule
Make a master schedule your child can use to block off time to work...
Authored by:
DISCIPLINARY CONTENT
Tuesday, Dec 29, 2020
Posted on: #iteachmsu
PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN
Evolution of Organizational Behavior
REF: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-organizationalbehavior/chapter/what-is-organizational-behavior
In a nutshell, organizational behavior is the study of how human behavior affects an organization. Organizational behavior aims to learn how an organization operates through the behaviors of its members. Instead of taking a strictly numerical approach to determine an organization’s operations, it takes a more psychological approach. By understanding people, you can better understand an organization
The academic study of organizational behavior can be dated back to Taylor’s scientific theory . However, certain components of organizational behavior can date back even further. In this section we will discuss how organizational behavior developed into a field of its own.
Looking back thousands of years we can find components of organizational behavior. Famous philosophers like Plato and Aristotle discussed key components of today’s organizations including the importance of leadership and clear communication. While these seem like very basic and broad concepts today, at the time they were innovative ideas and helped to lay the foundation for organizational behavior.
If organizational behavior were a simple topic, this course would be short and sweet. We could simply say that organizational behavior is how people and groups act within an organization. But it’s not so simple!
When organizational behavior grew into an academic study with the rise of the Industrial Revolution, it began to complicate what could appear to be simple topics. People began asking a lot of questions and started critiquing how organizations operated. Like many academic ventures, people began to deep dive into how behavior plays a role in organizations and why changes in behavior alter the way organizations operate. Along the way, organizational behavior has grown to incorporate components of management, psychology, leadership, personality traits, motivation, etc.
Organizational behavior has grown into its own niche within a wide variety of other genres. This is exciting because it allows us to really investigate each and every aspect of behavior within an organization! Today, organizational behavior is recognized as an essential component of an organization. Scholars and businesses alike recognize its importance and continue to help it adapt to current issues and new findings.
In a nutshell, organizational behavior is the study of how human behavior affects an organization. Organizational behavior aims to learn how an organization operates through the behaviors of its members. Instead of taking a strictly numerical approach to determine an organization’s operations, it takes a more psychological approach. By understanding people, you can better understand an organization
The academic study of organizational behavior can be dated back to Taylor’s scientific theory . However, certain components of organizational behavior can date back even further. In this section we will discuss how organizational behavior developed into a field of its own.
Looking back thousands of years we can find components of organizational behavior. Famous philosophers like Plato and Aristotle discussed key components of today’s organizations including the importance of leadership and clear communication. While these seem like very basic and broad concepts today, at the time they were innovative ideas and helped to lay the foundation for organizational behavior.
If organizational behavior were a simple topic, this course would be short and sweet. We could simply say that organizational behavior is how people and groups act within an organization. But it’s not so simple!
When organizational behavior grew into an academic study with the rise of the Industrial Revolution, it began to complicate what could appear to be simple topics. People began asking a lot of questions and started critiquing how organizations operated. Like many academic ventures, people began to deep dive into how behavior plays a role in organizations and why changes in behavior alter the way organizations operate. Along the way, organizational behavior has grown to incorporate components of management, psychology, leadership, personality traits, motivation, etc.
Organizational behavior has grown into its own niche within a wide variety of other genres. This is exciting because it allows us to really investigate each and every aspect of behavior within an organization! Today, organizational behavior is recognized as an essential component of an organization. Scholars and businesses alike recognize its importance and continue to help it adapt to current issues and new findings.
Authored by:
Sands

Posted on: #iteachmsu

Evolution of Organizational Behavior
REF: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-organizationalbehavior/ch...
Authored by:
PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN
Tuesday, Dec 29, 2020
Posted on: #iteachmsu
NAVIGATING CONTEXT
Management Theories
Management theories help organizations to focus, communicate, and evolve. Using management theory in the workplace allows leadership to focus on their main goals. When a management style or theory is implemented, it automatically streamlines the top priorities for the organization. Management theory also allows us to better communicate with people we work with which in turn allows us to work more efficiently. By understanding management theory, basic assumptions about management styles and goals can be assumed and can save time during daily interactions and meetings within an organization.
Theories can only reach so far, and management theories are no exception. There is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all management theory. What may work for one organization may not be relevant for another. Therefore, when one theory does not fit a particular situation, it is important to explore the option of developing a new theory that would lead in a new, more applicable direction. While some theories can stand the test of time, other theories may grow to be irrelevant and new theories will develop in their place.
We can find many management theories introduced on :
Scientific Management Theory
Administrative Management Theory
Bureaucratic Management Theory
Human Relations Management Theory
X&Y Management Theory
REF: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wmopen-organizationalbehavior/chapter/management-theory-and-organizational-behavior/
Theories can only reach so far, and management theories are no exception. There is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all management theory. What may work for one organization may not be relevant for another. Therefore, when one theory does not fit a particular situation, it is important to explore the option of developing a new theory that would lead in a new, more applicable direction. While some theories can stand the test of time, other theories may grow to be irrelevant and new theories will develop in their place.
We can find many management theories introduced on :
Scientific Management Theory
Administrative Management Theory
Bureaucratic Management Theory
Human Relations Management Theory
X&Y Management Theory
REF: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wmopen-organizationalbehavior/chapter/management-theory-and-organizational-behavior/
Authored by:
Greg

Posted on: #iteachmsu

Management Theories
Management theories help organizations to focus, communicate, and e...
Authored by:
NAVIGATING CONTEXT
Tuesday, Dec 29, 2020